Introduction: Ensuring the mechanical resistance of pharmaceutical glass vials is crucial for safe and efficient drug delivery. While allowing for high throughput and efficiency, the bulk Fill & Finish process exerts high level of stress on glass containers, such as glass-to-glass contact and vertical loads, which can lead to cosmetic defects and breakages. Superior vial quality mitigates the negative impact of this stress, improving filling process performance and output as well as reducing the risk of container breakage during transport.
Mechanical resistance was assessed using two quantitative techniques
1. Vertical Compression Test (VC): This test measures the maximum force a vial can withstand before failure when subjected to axial stress.
Figure 1: Sample before (left) and after (right) VC test.
2. Burst Test (BT): This test is performed to apply internal pressure to the glass container to obtain its maximum value of internal pressure resistance.
Figure 2: Sample before (left) and after (right) the burst test.
Both tests compared Nexa® and Fina® vials. From the results achieved (VC and BT), Nexa® vials showed consistent superior mechanical resistance.
2R ISO vials
Figure 3: Boxplot of Vertical Compression results for 2R Fina® and Nexa® vials.
Figure 4: Boxplot of Burst Test Results for 2R Fina® and Nexa® vials
Operational Benefits of Nexa® Vials - Thanks to their improved cosmetic quality and mechanical resistance, Nexa® vials provide several advantages:
This study analyzed the improved mechanical resistance of Nexa® vials by comparing them to Fina® vials through vertical compression (VC) and burst test (BT). According to the results achieved, Nexa® vials have superior mechanical resistance, even 3x Fina® with regards to Vertical compression (VC).
Thanks to its improved mechanical resistance, the Nexa® vial platform offers advantages in terms of: